It is difficult to portray true sympathy. The words fail somehow; they become crass or ridiculous. Language fails often where thought is concerned. However, it is important, somehow, to express what we feel; especially to those we care about and perhaps more importantly: to ourselves.
Life, it would seem, is very short and it is difficult to be sympathetic to this when the workday seems so long or the weekend so far off. This, on the other hand, seems to be a failure of thought but the results are the same:
“hump-day…yay!”
“Thank god it’s Friday!”
It is as if we are wishing parts of our lives away. But we are unable to be sympathetic to the true consequences of doing so. Those boring days that we wished away are automatically the subject of longing and desire when we realize, in short and few moments, how short life really is. Sympathy seems important to remember if we are to understand that a beautiful day or a starry night is…well, miraculous.
But our thoughts cannot contain such grandiose ideas and as a result our language fails. No matter how much we may love, the word “love” will always fall short. No matter how much we may seem to care, the word “care” never cuts it.
Philosophers have pondered the concept of time and the only objectively real component of temporal ideas: it is the present. And so, be sympathetic to the present and what it contains, which is the whole universe; something that we may never come to understand.
Is sympathy a stand-in for “taking care”, or “attending to completely”?
The word sympathy seems to imply a dualistic separation from living activity in the present moment (thereby missing the point of living completely).