A Little Soap Box

If we are to progress in any meaningful way as a species we must overcome the particular fears and beliefs that have defined us throughout history and continue to define us today. This idea is not new. The idea to overcome humanity’s shortcomings by changing not only the way we think, but our actions and the reasons that we act is one that has been presented by great thinkers throughout the history of our species. We simply must learn to listen to them.

There are three frailties of humanity that stand in the way of progress. Make no mistake, these frailties do not stop progress completely, but only slow it down. The first is tribalism in all its forms. There can be no “us” versus “them”. Where there is patriotism there is nationalism, and where there is nationalism there is war. We have come to the point in our history where we cannot afford war.

The second shortcoming that will define humanity’s future for better or worse is ideological belief whether it is in a religious form or a political one. Ideology is a certitude that leads to tribalism, to the death of curiosity and to confusion. Our ideologies, if they define us, take over us and create a concrete bunker in which intellect dies. Our ideologies are born out of fear and arrogance. Not knowing an answer is always better than creating one out of thin air.

The third is as old as the gods and is known by many names: selfishness, avarice, greed. To have enough is something that does not come naturally to most of us and to have too much is something that is not often enough recognized. We have many excuses for our greed ranging from family to individual rights. Greed is too many times measured economically, but its seed is psychological.

The question must become what kind of society do we want to live in? The question will become what will we have to do in order to achieve this society. The question is simply when will we have to decide these things and how.

2 comments

  1. I expect the third frailty is bound in our genes (the tendency to guard resources once meant survival) and will always be a struggle for each individual.

    However, the first two can be addressed more broadly… Have you read Jonathan Haidt’s ideas? He addresses the first two frailties in his writings and more pithily in his TED talk “The moral roots of liberals and conservatives” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SOQduoLgRw ).

    1. Hi J and thanks for your comment. I’m not sure that avarice is genetic, but fear-based. Consider that altruistic behavior has been found in nature seems to be more suggestive of genetic foundations. The level of avarice in the world today, I would think, seems to be the consequent of social systems that reward such attitudes.
      I’ve not read Haidt’s ideas, but will certainly search out his TED talk. I have, however, read some articles concerning the different attitudes of liberals and conservatives and why those attitudes differ.
      Again, thanks for reading and commenting!

Leave a comment